Monday, February 02, 2026

Jason Smith: Restoring a health care system that puts patients first


(From Eighth District Congressman Jason Smith)

For too many American families, workers, and seniors, health care is increasingly unaffordable, with double digit premium increases now going into effect on an annual basis. When many Americans think of health insurance, they think of higher costs, soaring deductibles, denied claims, and increased stress from something that is meant to improve their lives. But what enrages so many working families even more is that while they are struggling to find the money to pay for it all, health insurers are posting record profits and consolidating greater control over America’s health care system. 

That is exactly why I called the CEOs of five of the nation’s largest health insurance empires to testify in front of the Ways and Means Committee: to get answers about why costs keep climbing, figure out what can be done to fix our health care system, and to hold folks accountable for their decisions.








Today, the average family health insurance plan costs roughly $27,000 a year. Individual deductibles routinely exceed $3,000, and family deductibles can reach $10,000 or more. Since the Un-Affordable Care Act (ACA) — also known as Obamacare — was enacted, premiums in Obamacare’s Health Exchanges have increased by roughly 80 percent, while families face out-of-pocket maximums exceeding $20,000. But the exploding cost of health insurance extends well beyond Obamacare, which covers only about 7 percent of Americans. Employer-sponsored plans — covering more than 160 million people — are now experiencing their largest premium increases in more than a decade.

One of the most troubling revelations from the hearing we held was how difficult insurers are making it for patients. Roughly one in five medical claims is denied. Patients are left navigating bureaucratic systems designed around insurer priorities instead of individual needs, while consolidation has reduced competition and choice. Today, just three insurers control nearly half of the national market, and three pharmacy benefit managers dominate roughly 80 percent of drug benefits. While costs for families rise, these health insurance empires rake in nearly $1 trillion in annual revenue, while their executives are rewarded with tens of millions of dollars in bonuses.

The hearing also underscored the role Democrats’ failed health care policies have played in driving these outcomes. Open-ended subsidies and rigid Washington mandates that may have been intended to expand access and lower costs, have instead rewarded higher spending, consolidation, and complexity. Federal programs lacking proper guardrails have become magnets for waste and fraud, with taxpayers footing the bill. Despite trillions of dollars flowing through the system, families are paying more and getting less in return.

These failures are felt even more intensely in rural communities like south-central and southeast Missouri. When costs rise and access shrinks, rural hospitals and clinics — already operating on thin margins — are often the first to feel the strain. Families in rural areas already face fewer provider options, longer travel times for care, and higher out-of-pocket burdens, making affordability not just a financial issue, but a question of access to care itself.








The takeaway from the Ways and Means Committee hearing was clear: the status quo is not working, and Americans deserve better. That is why President Trump’s Great Healthcare Plan — which he announced on January 15 — is so important. The President’s plan lays out a framework focused on restoring affordability by strengthening competition, increasing transparency, and holding abusive middlemen accountable. It expands health savings options, promotes direct primary care and telehealth, cracks down on fraud and abuse, and puts patients — not insurers or Washington bureaucrats — back at the center of the system.

Lowering health care costs will not happen overnight, but it starts with honest oversight, tough questions, and a willingness to challenge a broken system. Health insurers are one piece of the health care system, but they are by no means the only industry in need of oversight — and the Ways and Means Committee plans on continuing to pursue answers on behalf of American patients and families. With President Trump’s leadership and the continued work of Congress, we can build a health care system that delivers affordability, access to quality care, and peace of mind for families in every corner of the country — urban and rural alike.

MSSU expanding nursing program with help from Mercy Joplin


(From Missouri Southern State University)

In addition to admitting a fall nursing cohort, Missouri Southern State University (MSSU) is increasing capacity by accepting a new group of nursing students for the spring semester. The expanded enrollment model, with 30 students admitted each fall and 20 students admitted each spring, will support four active cohorts and allow upwards of 100 students to progress through the program at any given time during their junior and senior years in the university’s Bachelor of Science in Nursing program.

The expansion is being supported through a generous commitment to the Missouri Southern Foundation from Mercy Hospital Joplin. The funds will help provide resources needed to support the increased enrollment and the university’s expanded statewide mission, which encompasses health and life sciences and immersive learning experiences.







“This is such an exciting and meaningful step forward for MSSU Nursing. This expansion reflects not only the growing demand for skilled nurses in our region but also the university’s commitment to meeting that need with excellence,” said Dr. Lisa Beals, MSSU associate professor of Nursing

“Mercy Hospital Joplin’s generous support will directly strengthen the learning environment for our students and help us continue building a strong, practice‑ready nursing workforce for the Four States community. With the upcoming launch of the MSN program and our continued 100% NCLEX pass rate, this expansion marks a powerful moment of momentum for MSSU Nursing, and I’m proud to be part of it.”

University officials said the addition of a second nursing cohort within an academic year marks a significant milestone in MSSU’s efforts to expand its health and life sciences programs and respond to the growing demand for highly qualified nursing professionals in the Four States region.

“We are very grateful for the commitment of Mercy Hospital Joplin to help the university expand its undergraduate nursing program,” said Dr. Dean Van Galen, MSSU president. “This support will enable Missouri Southern to prepare even more students for rewarding and impactful careers in the healthcare industry.”








“We’re truly excited to collaborate with MSSU as they expand their nursing program," said Jeremy Drinkwitz, president of Mercy Joplin and Southeast Kansas. “Saying yes to this opportunity was easy—it lifts the university, it empowers new nurses, it supports Mercy, and above all, it strengthens care for the community we proudly serve. We can’t wait to welcome more MSSU‑produced nurses into our halls."

Earlier this fall, MSSU announced approval of a new Master of Science in Nursing program, which is scheduled to begin accepting students in Fall 2026.

MSSU’s nursing program has demonstrated continued success, with graduates achieving a 100% pass rate on the National Council Licensure Examination for the past three consecutive years.

For more information about MSSU’s nursing program, visit https://www.mssu.edu/academics/education/nursing/index.php


Detention motion: Branson entertainers had 46 videos of underage girl


A search warrant executed June 13 at the home of Branson entertainers Garry and Janine Carson turned up 46 videos of an underaged girl, with several of the videos featuring nude or semi-nude dances by the child and Janine Carson, according to detention motions filed today in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

The detention motion for Garry Carson indicated he was naked while filming the two and considered the videos to be "fashion shows."

Janine Carson's detention motion indicated she initially denied the allegations, but later said they were doing "fashion shows."


The Carsons, who perform a magic show at two Branson venues and also perform in Las Vegas, are charged with sexual exploitation of children. An indictment was unsealed Thursday.







Initial appearances for the Carsons were held this morning in U. S. District Court in Springfield. Their arraignments and detention hearings will be held separately Thursday.

The allegations against the couple are detailed in the detention motion.

On June 13, 2025, members of the Southwest Missouri Cybercrimes Task Force executed a federal search warrant upon the residence of defendants, JANINE and GARRY CARSON, and seized multiple digital storage devices, including a cellular telephone and computer.

The devices were subsequently forensically examined yielding the discovery of approximately 46 video recordings depicting an identified minor (MV1). Several of the videos depict MV1 engaged in acts of striptease along with defendant JANINE CARSON. 

For example, one such video depicts MV1 entering room bottomless, attired in high heels, and a shirt. MV1 dances for the camera and exits the room.







JANINE CARSON then enters the room wearing a see-through robe and exposes her bare buttocks and vagina to the camera. Several other video recordings depict MV1, completely nude, tumbling down a cushion. These videos were recorded in slow motion.

Both defendants were interviewed on scene. GARRY CARSON ultimately acknowledged that he filmed MV1 and his wife while naked and characterized such productions as “fashion shows.”

This Court is obligated to consider “the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether the offense… involves a minor victim… .” 

The evidence against the defendant is overwhelming.

Wherefore, based upon the foregoing, the United States submits that there is clear and convincing evidence that there are no conditions which the Court could place upon the defendant that would reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance in Court and the safety of the community.

The Government therefore requests that a detention hearing be held and that the defendant be detained pending trial of this matter.


From the detention motion for Janine Carson:

JANINE CARSON initially denied any knowledge of the above-described video recordings. JANINE CARSON, after being confronted with the contents of one such recording, asserted that she and MV1 were doing a fashion show.

Saturday, January 31, 2026

Nancy Hughes: Are you bankrupt?

“What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?” Mark 8:36 (NIV)

Have you ever prayed for someone and then realized much later that you had not been praying the way the Lord would have wanted? Probably we all have. A friend of mine shared with me how the Lord redirected her prayer quickly and clearly.

Barbara told me that she had lunch with a couple who told her they were struggling financially. They shared how there never seemed to be enough money at the end of the month for everything they felt they needed along with paying all the bills.

“My heart just broke for how hard they worked,” she told me. “Even though they both had great jobs, they were worried that they would be bankrupt within a few months if things didn’t turn around financially.”








Barbara shared that as she drove away after lunch, she began to lift the couple up to the Lord. “Father, please help them,” she prayed. “The last thing they need is to be bankrupt.” But she said that the Lord immediately spoke truth to her heart.

“Pray for them. But understand the problem is not that they are bankrupt financially; it is that they are bankrupt spiritually.” Her prayer instantly changed for the couple.

Jesus knew that the pull of the world and what it offered would be a huge temptation for His children. That is why there is one Scripture after another in the Bible that addresses that very struggle.

In Mark 8:36, Jesus asks a pointed question: “What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?” He is speaking to a large crowd with His disciples at His side and yet He is speaking to us, too.

The couple Barbara spoke with could fail to pay the money they owe and have to declare bankruptcy. They could also work harder, perhaps, and pay off their financial debt. But can I ask you this: what’s the point of being financially free if we're spiritually bankrupt?

Every single thing that the world offers us may appear beautiful but it is temporary. And because of sin, the more we get, the more we want. Jesus offers us eternal freedom. We can never pay the debt of being spiritually bankrupt but we don’t need to because Jesus paid that debt with His death on the cross.








When you give Jesus your heart – your everything – you are no longer spiritually bankrupt. You are eternally His. If you have financial debt, I encourage you to seek Christian financial counseling to get on the right path. But first, go before the Lord and ask Him to be Lord of your life. Get in the Word and seek His direction for everything that you do, every day. Be spiritually debt-free in Him. For eternity.

Father, I want you to be the focus of my life completely. May I look less at what the world offers and more on your face and eternal life. In Jesus’ Name. Amen.

R.A.P. it up . . .

Reflect


Where is the majority of your focus centered every day? Spiritually or worldly?

Does your life reflect that you are seeking more of Jesus or more of stuff?

Apply

Write Mark 8:36 in your journal. Make a column titled “gain the whole world” under it and write down everything material that you consider important in your life and cannot live without.

Now, beside each one, write “yes” or “no” as you consider whether each thing on your list is worth forfeiting your soul. If you answered “yes” to anything you wrote down, seek the Lord’s face and lay that item down before Him.

Power

Mark 8:36 (NIV) “What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his soul?”

Matthew 6:21 (NIV) “For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”

Proverbs 23:5 (NIV) “Cast but a glance at riches, and they are gone, for they will surely sprout wings and fly off to the sky like an eagle.”

(For more of Nancy Hughes' writing, check out her blog, Encouragement from the War Room.)

Missouri Attorney General sues Census Bureau demanding only legal citizens be counted


(From Attorney General Catherine Hanaway)

To defend our fundamental right to representation in government, Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway filed the most significant election lawsuit in a generation. This first-in-the-nation suit was filed against the United States Department of Commerce (DOC) and the Census Bureau for unconstitutionally allowing illegal aliens to commandeer the path to The White House and compromise our elections.

“The State of Missouri and its voters can no longer ignore the ongoing denial of their right to self-government and fair representation,” said Attorney General Hanaway. “United States citizens and lawful permanent residents have a right to representation, unlike illegal aliens and temporary visa holders. In America, the People, the members of the social compact, are the only legitimate source of the government’s power. We are taking a stand against those who are cheating our system.”








The DOC and the Census Bureau’s current policy of counting illegal aliens in the census tabulation is unjust, unlawful, and unconstitutional. Attorney General Hanaway is demanding a Census recount and that the Court prohibit the inclusion of illegal aliens in the Census.

Federal representation is being stolen from states who uphold immigration law, including Missouri, and transferred to sanctuary states who artificially inflate their population by harboring illegal aliens. Attorney General Hanaway will not allow open-border states like California, New York, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Maryland to steal an estimated 11 congressional seats, 11 electoral votes, and billions of dollars in funding.

Prior to the 1980 Census, the Carter Administration unilaterally decided that all illegal aliens and temporary visa holders should be counted in the decennial Census and included in the apportionment of congressional representation. The framers of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment would have been shocked by this policy. They could never have imagined an absurd system where 15 million illegal alien trespassers would receive representation in Congress and the Electoral College.

In July of 2020, President Trump issued a memorandum requiring the Secretary of Commerce to exclude illegal aliens from the decennial apportionment base, even though illegal aliens were counted in the 2020 Census. California and New York immediately sued against the President’s action. Ultimately, the Supreme Court vacated all the injunctions, but these legal delays opened the door for the Biden Administration to reverse course and include illegal aliens in the apportionment base for federal representation.








If President Trump had succeeded in excluding illegal aliens from the 2021 apportionment, Missouri would have received an extra congressional seat and an extra vote in the Electoral College. Instead, the Biden Administration hijacked the representation of Missourians by reversing the Trump Administration’s action.

The inclusion of illegal aliens robs Missouri and its citizens of federal funding and private funding that they would otherwise receive. According to the Census Bureau, more than 350 federal programs rely on census figures to allocate funds to state and local governments. Including illegal aliens in the 2020 and 2030 Census enumerations has harmed and will harm Missourians by depriving them of their fair share of their own tax dollars.

The Attorney General’s complaint filed on January 30, 2026, requests that the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri:

Declare that including illegal aliens and temporary visa holders in the 2020 Census and the 2021 Apportionment base violated Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act;








Require the Census Bureau to redo the 2020 Census and 2021 Apportionment, removing from the apportionment base all illegal aliens and temporary visa holders through the best available methods, including by re-conducting the 2020 Census enumeration if necessary;

Declare that including illegal aliens and temporary visa holders in the 2030 Census, and the 2031 Apportionment base would violate Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act; and Prohibit the Census Bureau from including illegal aliens and temporary visa holders in the 2030 Census tabulation.

Missouri and the American people will continue to be robbed of fair representation in the House of Representatives, the Electoral College, and federal funding if corrective action is not taken.

The full complaint can be read here.

Indivisible Joplin removes incorrect report of ICE agents in Joplin


A report on Indivisible Joplin's Facebook page saying ICE agents had been spotted in Joplin was incorrect and has been taken down.

Indivisible Joplin issued a correction earlier this evening, but reiterates that it has learned ICE is coming.







UPDATE on post about possible I.C.E. activity in Joplin:

We posted earlier about I.C.E. agents being spotted yesterday at Joplin Ave Coffee Co and have since been informed that the officers are actually with the Joplin Police Department, so the post has been removed.

We apologize for assuming they were I.C.E. agents. This mix up occurred because the message we got claims these individuals were wearing I.C.E. hoodies, so take that information for what you will.

Information that HAS NOT changed: We have been informed by a local business owner that they were warned they should expect I.C.E. sweeps at businesses in the Joplin area.

Missouri sports betting tops $543M in first month but deductions leave state with only $521K


By Rudi Keller

Missourians placed more than half-a-billion dollars in bets on sporting events in December but promotional offers offset the taxable profits, leaving less than $1 million to help problem gamblers and public education.

Voters narrowly approved sports betting in November 2024, with a majority of just 2,691 votes out of almost 3 million cast. The first month’s wagering far exceeded some estimates with $543 million wagered, more than 99% through online platforms.








The financial report, issued Friday by the Missouri Gaming Commission, showed the impact of provisions in the constitutional amendment allowing companies accepting bets to deduct the cost of promotional and other expenses.

The 16 licensed operators provided customers more than $125 million in free bets and other promotional benefits. As a result, most showed a negative result and deductions exceeded net revenue by $20 million.

The gaming commission received nearly $7.5 million from initial license fees paid for the 16 retail and online licenses. Two companies, DraftKings and Circa Sports, are online-only licenses, while the other 14 are either in casinos, at major sports venues or online platforms partnering with a major sports team.

The net to the state was $521,200, or less than one-one-hundredth of 1% of the total wagered.

“The license-fee total reflects the fact that a majority of the licenses issued at launch are five-year licenses,” Mike Leara, executive director of the gaming commission, said in a news release. “These figures also reflect a market in its early stages, including the impact of significant promotional deductions that are customary during initial rollout.”

The commission anticipates using 9% of the licensing fees for administration, and the remainder will be transferred to the Compulsive Gaming Prevention Fund. Most of that is a one-time infusion of money because the major licenses have a five-year life, Leara said in an interview with The Independent.

The result is encouraging despite the small total for tax revenue, Leara said. The structure of the constitutional amendment meant that small returns are likely during the opening months, he said.

“When we finally get through some of this early start up costs, we’ll see money,” he said.








The promotional offers will diminish and bettors will settle into patterns as the market matures, he said.

“In six months, we’re going to have a better gage of what to expect on the month to month basis, and I think that it will increase these numbers,” Leara said.

State Rep. Dirk Deaton, a Republican from Noel who chairs the House Budget Committee, called the revenue report “sad” and said it was what he expected from an initiative written by the online sports betting companies.

“We might as well have just made them tax free at this point,” Deaton said.

The initiative campaign was launched after lawmakers tried for several years, and failed, to write a bill authorizing sports wagering.

“In the General Assembly, we ought to look ourselves in the mirror,” he said. “It’s probably another example of something which we should have figured out and put a better framework in place.”

The tax on the net revenue of sports wagering platforms is 10%, less than half of the 21% tax on net receipts for the state’s 13 licensed casinos. During December, the casinos paid $36.2 million in taxes on net winnings of $172.4 million.

Leara said he agreed that the low tax revenue is due to lawmakers failing to pass sports wagering legislation.

“This could have been much different,” Leara said. “The tax rate could have been higher and the deductions would have likely, absolutely, been less.”

Under the Missouri Constitution, most tax revenue from gambling is dedicated to public schools and higher education. Casinos paid $363 million in taxes in the fiscal year that ended June 30 and the Missouri Lottery provided about $337 million.

The 2024 initiative campaign, organized by the state’s professional sports teams and paid for by DraftKings and FanDuel, two of the major online sports books, cost $43 million. An opposition campaign, financed by Caesars Entertainment, owners of three casinos in Missouri, spent $15 million.

During the campaign to pass sports wagering, voters were told it would be a windfall to education, allowing increased teacher pay and other benefits for public schools. 








“It doesn’t necessarily match the commercials that got this passed, does it,” said state Sen. Rusty Black, a Republican from Chillicothe who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Black, who was a teacher before becoming a legislator, said in an interview with The Independent he is not sure when any of the promised benefits for education will be realized.

“Sports gaming will probably provide $100 million to education total, as long as I don’t die in the next 10 years,” Black said.

Only DraftKings, however, won one of the two licenses that went to online platforms that are not linked to one of the state’s casinos or major league sports teams.

DraftKings captured nearly 40% of the market, booking $195 million in bets but showing a negative net result after paying out $163 million in winnings and giving bettors $48.5 million in promotional and other benefits. DraftKings paid no tax and had $16 million in deductions carried over into January.

Circa Sports, the other “untethered” licensee, handled only $1.4 million in wagers and showed $1.3 million in deductions. Circa Sports paid $11,739 in tax.

FanDuel won a license from the Missouri Gaming Commission by partnering with St. Louis City, a Major League Soccer team. FanDuel booked $212 million in wagers but also showed a net negative result, with $166 million paid out in winnings and $53 million in deductions for promotional benefits. The company paid no tax and carries over $7 million in deductions to January.

The $543 million handle shows that the launch of sports betting in Missouri was successful, said Jack Cardetti, spokesman for the Sports Betting Alliance.

“We applaud the Missouri Gaming Commission for its hard work to ensure a smooth and successful launch,” Cardetti said in a prepared statement, “and we’ve received overwhelmingly positive feedback from Missourians who are impressed with the tools and resources available to help them monitor their play, protect their data and provide the security they feel in placing legal, regulated bets, while keeping their dollars in Missouri.”’

In a separate statement, Cardetti said the small return to the state was an expected result of the promotional deductions in the amendment.

“Like in most states, permanent, dedicated tax revenues for education will grow significantly over time after starting small in the initial months of a new sports betting program, due to investing in marketing efforts to migrate bettors out of illegal and unregulated settings toward state-licensed operators,” Cardetti said. “Missouri’s sports betting law anticipated this transition period and required millions in up front licensing fees, with nearly $7.5 million in fees already paid to the state.”

The fiscal estimates for the initiative showed revenue could be as little as nothing or as much as $28.9 million a year.

State Rep. Betsy Fogle, ranking Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said she expected more money, even with the heavy advertising of promotions to lure customers.








“I guess it’s not super surprising to me that we haven’t seen real dollars work their way into our revenue streams yet, and I would anticipate that those would increase as those promotionals have gone away,” she said.

In Kansas, where the tax and deduction allowances are similar to Missouri, operators paid taxes that were less than 1% of $2.7 billion in bets in the past fiscal year. Lawmakers in Kansas are considering whether to change the tax structure to capture more of the revenue. A similar move is much harder in Missouri because it would require another statewide vote to change the constitution.

“Because sports wagering was adopted through a voter-approved constitutional amendment, core elements such as the tax structure and allowable deductions cannot simply be adjusted by the General Assembly,” Black said in a statement.

Gambling alone cannot pay for public schools or higher education, Deaton said

“There’s no taxation structure in which that would ever be the case, or could be, unless we just were spending significantly less,” he said.

When education will see any money from sports wagering is uncertain. The amendment included a carve-out, setting aside the first $5 million in annual tax revenue for the Compulsive Gaming Prevention Fund.

Fogle, who said she voted for the amendment because she wanted to place bets, said she doubted during the campaign that education would see any significant benefits.

“I thought it was disingenuous,” Fogle said, “and I recommended people not vote for it because of the promises for education.”

Missouri appeals court rejects Secretary of State’s ballot language on private school funding ban


By Annelise Hanshaw

Missouri’s Western District Court of Appeals unanimously tossed out part of Secretary of State Denny Hoskins’s ballot language on Thursday for an initiative petition that would bar state funding of private education.

The decision, written by Judge Douglas Thomson, says that Hoskins’s summary statement was “misleading” because of a bullet point that says the petition would “eliminate existing programs that provide direct aid to students with special education needs.” The petition, filed by attorney Duane Martin with public education law firm EdCounsel, expressly allows public aid to private entities to educate students with disabilities.








“The failure to account for the disability exception in bullet point two — and instead state that special education programs would be eliminated — is insufficient and unfair,” Thomson wrote.

Hoskins, presumably, was referring to the state’s voucher program, MOScholars. The program pays for school tuition for students with and without disabilities, though those who need learning accommodations receive priority and an increased scholarship amount.

The petition seeks to dramatically restrict MOScholars by barring the state from funding scholarships for nondisabled students. Martin told The Independent in August that he views state funding of private school vouchers as a threat to public education.

“We’re watching the statewide elected officials from Missouri slowly dismantle public schools, this public school system that Missourians have built,” he said.

The court revised the ballot language to say the petition would “eliminate certain expenditures that provide direct or indirect aid to students for their educational needs by prohibiting the use of public funds for educational services provided by nonpublic schools, except for services provided to disabled students.”

The decision comes a week after the Missouri Supreme Court tossed out a law passed last year that would have allowed Hoskins to rewrite ballot titles three times before a judge could remedy the language.

The Secretary of State’s Office declined to comment, saying it “does not comment on active litigation.”

Missouri Right to Education Initiative

A second pro-public-education petition is making its way through the courts, securing a win Thursday over a parent and voucher advocate who sought to intervene in the case.

The Missouri Right to Education Initiative seeks to label education a fundamental right in the State Constitution, charging the government with “maintaining adequate, thorough and uniform high quality free public schools.”

Spencer Toder, who filed the petition, told The Independent that the initiative is not aimed at changing MOScholars.








“Our intent is not to get involved in the voucher dialog,” he said in August. “It is to ensure that no matter if vouchers exist, it doesn’t come at the expense of public school students’ quality of education.”

But the ballot language from Hoskins’s office said the petition would eliminate the voucher program. Toder challenged the summary in Cole County Circuit Court, where Judge Chris Limbaugh ordered Hoskins to rewrite part of the summary twice.

In that case, Becki Uccello intervened as a mother of a disabled student who receives MOScholars funds and an advocate with the American Federation for Children, which pushes for vouchers and similar programs nationwide. She sought to defend Hoskins’s original summary statement.

The initiative, if approved by voters, would be used in court to challenge the voucher program, her attorneys wrote in an appeal of Limbaugh’s decision.

But Uccello had no right to appeal, Toder’s attorney, Heidi Vollet, argued.

The Western District Court of Appeals threw out Uccello’s arguments, saying she lacked standing to defend the Secretary of State’s ballot language.

Private parties only have a right to challenge ballot titles, not defend them, the court said in a unanimous decision written by Judge Gary Witt.







“Since Uccello’s grounds for intervention were to advocate for the same language that was proposed by the secretary initially, and which the secretary was defending on the same grounds, she has not established that she has any defense beyond the secretary, as party defendant,” wrote Witt.

Alix Cossette, an attorney with Stinson LLP who represented Uccello, told The Independent that Thursday’s decision carries ramifications for future ballot title cases.

“This is going to affect how people challenge or defend the secretary’s language,” she said. “If you want to defend what the secretary is doing, you are going to have to let the secretary just do that.”

In a footnote, Witt clarifies that individuals can intervene on ballot title cases when they oppose the secretary’s proposed language, writing: “The rule cannot be that if a petitioner friendly to the secretary’s summary files a specious challenge, a citizen with legitimate complaints as to the fairness and sufficiency of the proposed ballot summary cannot intervene to raise those legitimate challenges.”

Friday, January 30, 2026

Make ICE unwelcome rallies this weekend in Joplin, Carthage


With the continuing controversy over methods being used by ICE in its efforts to deport non-citizens, "Make ICE Unwelcome" rallies have been scheduled for the next two weekend in Jasper County.

The events are sponsored by SWMO NICE WATCH.

Rallies are scheduled for 12 noon to 3 p.m. Saturday, January 31, and Saturday, February 7, in Central Park in Carthage and 3 p.m. until dark Sunday, February 1, and Sunday, February 8, at 7th and Range Line in Joplin.










Joplin man indicted on 3 counts of sexual exploitation of a children, child pornography charge


A Joplin man is being held without bond in the Greene County Detention Center in Springfield after being indicted by a federal grand jury on three counts of sexual exploitation of a minor and one count of receiving and distributing child pornography.

Spencer Logan Hunt, 32, was charged following an investigation that began with CyberTip Reports from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, according to a detention motion filed today in U. S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

The tips were sent by Reddit, Inc, after Hunt, using the name "Daddyloveslittles92" discussed molesting children in a chat.







The motion included examples of some of the things Hunt allegedly said during these conversations including saying, he would like to have teens "caged up in my house" where he would rape them "all day long. He said leave them just enough food and water so they wouldn't die and he would invited his friends over to share.

Hunt also said if he could get away with raping kids in the basement he'd "already be doing it."

The statements also included Hunt using graphic descriptions of what he would do to some children.

On April 9, 2025, TFO Rawlins conducted a post-Miranda interview. HUNT identified himself as “Daddyloveslittles92,” and confirmed sending the messages about minors to other users. A search of HUNT’s Apple iPhone 12 Pro revealed videos and images of child pornography, including images depicting three known minors as identified in Counts 1-3 of the indictment.

Hunt's arraignment and detention hearing are scheduled for 10 a.m. Wednesday, February 4 in U. S. District Court in Springfield.